ex2232.mw


Problem 22.3-2: The Wet and Dry Bulb Psychrometer

The system, shown in Fig. 22.3-2, is a pair of thermometers, one of which is covered with a cylindrical wick kept saturated with water.  The wick will cool by evaporation into the moving air stream and for steady operation will approach an asymptotic value know as the wet bulb temperature.  The bare thermometer, on the other hand, will tend to approach the actual temperature of the approaching air, and this value is called the dry bulb temperature.  Develop an expression for determining the humidity of the air from the wet and dry bulb temperature readings neglecting radiation and assuming that the replacement of the evaporating water has no significant effect on the wet bulb temperature measurement.  

Assumptions:

1) Fluid velocity is high enough that reading is unaffected by radiation and heat conduction along the thermomenter stems but not too fast where viscous dissipation heat effects are insignificant.

2) Heat of vaporization can be considered the difference between the heat at the surface of the wick and the heat at the surface of the thermometer.

Definition of Symbols:

c = concentration

Cphat = heat capacity per unit mass

Cptil = heat capacity per mole

DAB = diffusion coefficient

dHvap = heat of vaporization

Dia = diameter of thermometer with wick

hm =heat transfer coefficient

kxm = mass transfer coefficient

L = length of the wick

NA0 = molar flux for species A

Num = Nusselt number

Pr = Prandtl number

Shm = Sherwood number

Tinf = dry bulb temperature

T0 = wet bulb temperature

WA0 = molar flow rate across the surface

xAinf = mole fraction of water in the approaching air

xA0 = initial film water concentration

>

restart;

Starting with the energy balance

>

eqn22_3_32:=Q=WA0*(HbarA1-HbarA0);

eqn22_3_32 := Q = WA0*(HbarA1-HbarA0)

The area corresponds to a cylinder (the shape of the thermometer)

>

A:=(Dia,L)->Pi*Dia*L;

A := proc (Dia, L) options operator, arrow; Pi*Dia*L end proc

Newton's law of Cooling

>

Q:=hm*A(Dia,L)*(Tinf-T0);

Q := hm*Pi*Dia*L*(Tinf-T0)

Replacing the change in enthalpy with dHvapA

>

HbarA1:=HbarA0+dHvapA;

HbarA1 := HbarA0+dHvapA

>

eqn22_3_32;

hm*Pi*Dia*L*(Tinf-T0) = WA0*dHvapA

To determine the desired quantity, we must solve the equation of continuity for this system.  Simplification of:

 

for steady, one-dimensional transport, in the absence of chemical reactions and external forces, gives:

>

Fluxeqn:=y->D(Nay)(y)=0;

 

fluxeqn := proc (y) options operator, arrow; D(NAy)(y) = 0 end proc

Therefore NAy is constant throughout the wick.  To determine the mole fraction profile, we need the molar flux for diffusion of A through stagnant B:

>

NAy:=y->-c*DAB*D(xA)(y)/(1-xA(y));

NAy := proc (y) options operator, arrow; -c*DAB*D(xA)(y)/(1-xA(y)) end proc

Insertion of the above equation into the equation of continuity and integration gives the mole fraction profile:

 

Here we have taken cDAB to be constant, at the value for the mean wick temperature.  We can then evaluate the constant flux NAy from the preceding two equations:

>

NA0:=-c*DAB*(xAinf-xA0)/(1-xA0);

NA0 := -c*DAB*(xAinf-xA0)/(1-xA0)

From the definition of the mass transfer coefficient:

>

WA:=A(Dia,L)*NA0;

WA := -Pi*Dia*L*c*DAB*(xAinf-xA0)/(1-xA0)

Rearranging the equation gives

>

eqn22_3_33:=WA0*(1-xA0)=kxm*A(Dia,L)*(xA0-xAinf);

eqn22_3_33 := WA0*(1-xA0) = kxm*Pi*Dia*L*(xA0-xAinf)

>

s:=solve({eqn22_3_32,eqn22_3_33},{WA0,hm});

s := {WA0 = -Pi*Dia*L*kxm*(xA0-xAinf)/(-1+xA0), hm = -dHvapA*kxm*(xA0-xAinf)/((Tinf-T0)*(-1+xA0))}

>

assign(s);

 

>

simplify(hm/kxm/dHvapA);

-(xA0-xAinf)/((Tinf-T0)*(-1+xA0))

Thus we have verified eq. 22.3-34

>

simplify(%-(xA0-xAinf)/(Tinf-T0)/(1-xA0));

0

Combining equations 22.3-32 and 22.3-33 gives the following equation

>

hm:='hm': eqn22_3_34:=hm/kxm/dHvapA=(xA0-xAinf)/(Tinf-T0)/(1-xA0);

eqn22_3_34 := hm/(kxm*dHvapA) = (xA0-xAinf)/((Tinf-T0)*(1-xA0))

We then transform the left hand side into dimensionless form.  In the conversion between the heat capacity per mass (Cphat) to the heat capacity per mol (Cptil), we assume the concentration c = 1.

>

hm:=Num*k/Dia;kxm:=Shm*DAB/Dia;k:=Cphat*mu/Pr;DAB:=mu/rho/Sc;Cphat:=c*Cptil/rho; c:=1: eqn22_3_34;

hm := Num*k/Dia

kxm := Shm*DAB/Dia

k := Cphat*mu/Pr

DAB := mu/(rho*Sc)

Cphat := c*Cptil/rho

Num*Cptil*Sc/(Pr*Shm*dHvapA) = (xA0-xAinf)/((Tinf-T0)*(1-xA0))

>

Num:=F(Reynolds)*Pr^n;

Num := F(Reynolds)*Pr^n

>

Shm:=F(Reynolds)*Sc^n;

Shm := F(Reynolds)*Sc^n

This simplifies to the following equation (22.3-38)

>

eqn22_3_38:=simplify(eqn22_3_34);

eqn22_3_38 := Pr^(n-1)*Cptil*Sc^(-n+1)/dHvapA = -(xA0-xAinf)/((Tinf-T0)*(-1+xA0))

Now evaluating this equation with numbers:

If an air-water mixture at 1 atm pressure gives a wet bulb temperature of 70 F and a dry bulb temperature of 140 F then

From Dr. Davis' start301 Matlab program vappr with Tdeg=F and H2O as the only compound:

>>vappr(70)
ans =
   2.5172 kPa

>

pAvap:=0.0247*atm; p:=1*atm; xA0:=pAvap/p; T0:=70*F; Tinf:=140*F;

pAvap := 0.247e-1*atm

p := atm

xA0 := 0.247e-1

T0 := 70*F

Tinf := 140*F

From Dr. Davis' FORTRAN program steam

Steam; given p,t,x
          p = 14.700  psia                           s =  0.07456  Btu/lbm-R
          t =   70.000  F                              h =    38.09  Btu/lbm
          v =  0.16049E-01  ft3/lbm            u =    38.05  Btu/lbm
          Compressed liquid

Steam; given p,t,x
          p =  0.363  psia                          s =  2.06449  Btu/lbm-R
          t =   70.000  F                            h =  1092.09  Btu/lbm
          v =  0.86817E+03  ft3/lbm         u =  1033.78  Btu/lbm
          Saturated vapor

dH=1092.09-38.09 Btu/lbm and the MW of water is 18.015*lbm/lbmol

>

MW:=18.015*lbm/lbmol: dHvapA:=(1092.09-38.09)*MW*Btu/lbm;

dHvapA := 18987.81000*Btu/lbmol

>

Sc:=0.58; Pr:=0.74;Cptil:=6.98*Btu/lbmol/F; n:=(1/3);

Sc := .58

Pr := .74

Cptil := 6.98*Btu/(lbmol*F)

n := 1/3

>

simplify(eqn22_3_38);

0.3124961908e-3/F = -0.1464750773e-5*(-247.+10000.*xAinf)/F

The answer we get is slightly higher than that listed in the example in BSL because the heat of vaporization we used determined from Dr. Davis' steam program is 88 Btu/lbm higher than that used in the book.

>

solve(eqn22_3_38,xAinf);

0.3365572563e-2