Cain Project Cain Project
About Us Newsletter Workshops/Courses Instructions/Help Gallery Make an Appointment Contact Us Cain Project

Managing Conflict in Teams

Whenever different people interact or work together in a group there is a potential for conflict to occur. You may encounter conflict in your CEVE team, in a student organization you belong to, in an internship position you work at, or simply in your everyday personal interactions with friends and family members. The topics covered below will help you negotiate conflict in any of these situations. In order to develop effective conflict management skills, you need to understand how people handle conflict, how conflict is negotiated through communication, and what steps you can take to resolve conflict in your life.

 

Conflict management styles

Every individual handles conflict differently. In a conflict situation, an individual's behavior can be described by how assertive and cooperative it is. Using these two dimensions of behavior, researchers have identified five methods of managing conflict. These five conflict management styles are shown below. Note where each style falls on the cooperation and assertiveness continuum. For instance, a competitive style is highly assertive but uncooperative; a collaborative style is high in both cooperative and assertive behavior, etc. Roll your mouse over each style to see a more detailed description.

You can assess your own conflict management style by taking the Thomas-Kilman Conflict Mode Assessment Instrument

 

Communication skills needed for effective conflict resolution

Now that you understand how individuals manage conflict situations, let's look at some of the communication skills you will need to manage conflict effectively.

  • Active listening

In order to understand the nature of any conflict, it is extremely important to listen to the other person's point of view. Only by carefully listening to their point of view can you truly identify their needs and interests. Active listening strategies include asking clarification questions, paraphrasing the other person to check the accuracy of your understanding of his or her position, as well as acknowledging that person's feelings and encouraging him or her to keep expressing them.

  • Nonverbal sensitivity

Nonverbal sensitivity refers to your ability to read the other person's nonverbal signs. Not only do you need to listen to the other person's verbal message, but you also need to "read" his or her nonverbals in order to get an accurate picture of how he or she feels. When listening, pay attention to your interlocutor's facial expressions, gestures, body posture, and paralanguage (i.e. pitch, speech rate, volume). Also, be aware of the nonverbals you are giving off. Avoid those that make you look defensive, and try to convey a sense of openness and supportiveness instead.

  • Empathetic understanding

Empathetic understanding refers to your ability to put yourself in other people's shoes. Put yourself in the other person's place and try to imagine how you would feel in that situation. Doing so helps you appreciate your opponent's position and see the conflict from his or her perspective.

  • Rhetorical sensitivity

Rhetorical sensitivity refers to the degree to which you adapt your messages to how you think others might react to them. In a conflict situation, you should monitor what you say and strive to find the most effective way to express your point without offending your opponent. In other words, be mindful of the effect of your words on other people and choose your words carefully.

  • "I-messages"

I-messages refer to the idea that you should take ownership of your thoughts and feelings when interacting with others. I-messages allow you to make it clear that this is how you feel or how you perceive a situation. Compare the following messages:

1. Your performance on the request for qualifications presentation was really poor.
2. Everyone in the group thought that you did very poorly on the presentation.
3. I was really disappointed by your presentation. I felt that you could have made a stronger point at the end.

The first two comments do not identify who owns these feelings. The first comment accuses the presenter of having done a poor job but it does not identify who owns the feelings. The second statement similarly fails to clearly identify the owner of those feelings and instead pushes it off on "everyone". The last statement is an example of an I-message because it clearly identifies who feels this way ("I was really disappointed").

  • No Ad-hominem arguments

Ad-hominem attacks are arguments that attack your opponent (or the integrity of your opponent) rather than the problem. Stay away from such name calling and focus on the issue at hand instead. Remember that personal attacks create resentment and are difficult to take back.

 

Method for resolving conflict: The principled negotiation
(adapted from Fisher & Ury, 1983 - click here for a summary of the book)

Principled negotiation is a conflict resolution strategy which encourages parties to a conflict to express their needs in an ethical, decent manner without offending anyone. If you encounter conflict in your team, try this four-step procedure:

  1. Separate the people from the problem
  2. In a conflict situation, differentiate between the problem and the people involved in it and deal with each separately. Use empathetic understanding and active listening to get to the core of the problem and to understand how the other party feels. The goal of this step is to understand the problem as well as the needs of all the parties involved in it.

  3. Focus on interests, not positions
  4. Each position has an underlying need or interest that gave rise to it. Your goal is to identify the interests or needs that lie at the heart of each party's position. Empathetic understanding may again be necessary in order to understand why your opponent(s) advocates a certain position. Consider the following statements:

    1. I insist that we use PowerPoint for our presentation.
    2. I insist that we use a presentation board for our presentation.

    Both positions seem incompatible until one examines the needs behind those positions. The first position could stem from a desire to showcase one's technology skills, while the second could stem from a desire to avoid the pitfalls of a PowerPoint presentation. Knowing what the underlying desires/needs are, allows the team to find a solution capable of meeting both needs (i.e. create a carefully designed slide show that showcases the team's technology skills while at the same time avoiding the pitfalls of a traditional PowerPoint presentation).

  5. Invent options for mutual gain
  6. The previous example shows how focusing on interests allows you to develop creative solutions that reconcile everyone's needs. Once you've identified the interests underlying each position, brainstorm for solutions that meet everyone's needs.

  7. Use objective criteria
  8. Make sure that the criteria you use to evaluate potential solutions are agreed upon by everyone. That way, team members will perceive the solution as fair, and satisfaction with the solution should be high.

 

External Resources:

NOAA Guide on managing conflict in a collaborative process

 

About Us Newsletter Workshops/Courses Instructions/Help Gallery Make an Appointment Contact Us Home

Cain Project The Cain Project in Engineering and Professional Communication
Telephone: 713-348-6141, Fax: 713-348-6175, e-mail: cainproj@rice.edu

© Copyright 2003  Rice University