BIOE 372 Spring 2005
Instructors: M. Liebschner
Presentation Critique for ___________________________________________________
Student Presentation Evaluation
|
Technical Content |
Poor |
Avg. |
Good |
Excellent |
Outstanding |
|
1) Summarized scope of investigation |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
2) Explained methods clearly |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
3) Reported significant results |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
4) Discussed sources of error and uncertainty |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
5) Figures explained |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
6) All information relevant to purpose |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
Organization and Style |
Poor |
Avg. |
Good |
Excellent |
Outstanding |
|
1) Overall organization (lg. Scale) |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
2) Organization of slides |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
3) Persuasive headings |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
4) Used short segments of text |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
5) Grammar, spelling, punctuation |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
6) Selected appropriate amount of material |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
Appearance |
Poor |
Avg. |
Good |
Excellent |
Outstanding |
|
1) Overall appearance |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
2) Quality of graphics |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
3) Highlighting of major concepts |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
4) Appropriate number of slides |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
5) Consistent formatting |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
6) Presentation in logical order |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
7) Clear and understandable talk |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
8) Answered questions adequately |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Comments:______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________